Showing posts with label WATER TESTING. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WATER TESTING. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Meanwhile, back on Paradise Road...


This 1,100-gallon tank was purchased for Jared and Heather McMicken and their children to supply them with fresh water to bathe and do laundry until a solution is found for their contaminated water. Chesapeake provided these tanks for two neighbors as well—the Mike Phillips and Scott Spencer families—who are currently experiencing the same water issues as the McMickens. Photo by Cain Chamberlin.

Chesapeake Responds to Paradise Road Water Woes
Cain Chamberlin
The Rocket-Courier, Wyalusing, PA
8/12/2010


A streak of bad luck seems to be lingering over Jared and Heather McMicken of Paradise Road in Terry Township.

It all started in early June, when the couple discovered a strange, brown discoloration in their tap water. They still do not know what exactly is causing the disturbance as they are awaiting water test results from DEP. However, the DEP testing done in mid-July did find rising levels of methane in the well, which has now led to something the McMickens never saw coming.

Both of their next-door neighbors, the Mike Phillips and the Scott Spencer families, have the same discoloration in their water wells, which started about a month after the McMickens made that discovery. They all believed that a nearby Chesapeake gas drilling site was responsible for the sudden dilemma. Even though Chesapeake denied the claims at first, they are now taking action in a joint effort with DEP to solve the residents’ water problems.

Because of the increasing levels of methane in the water of each home, DEP installed an alarm device in the basement of each home. These devices are specifically designed to detect high amounts of methane that could be hazardous.

“We were told that if the alarms ever went off, we should call 911 immediately,” said Heather McMicken.

Early last Wednesday morning, their alarm went off, and the McMickens were consequently evacuated from their home as a precautionary measure.

“We made the call, and in no time DEP and Chesapeake were here,” she said. Since then, the McMickens and their two children have stayed at a hotel and also at the home of her mother until they feel safe enough to move back. They do make occasional stops at their home to pick up more clothes and necessities.

Meanwhile, DEP and Chesapeake have been on the property nearly every day trying to find an answer to the current predicament.

“Both are still doing all kinds of testing for us, and we are willing to welcome a third party to do tests too,” Jared McMicken explained.

During a meeting held late last week between Chesapeake and the Paradise Road residents, the company offered to have replacement water wells drilled for each home and purchase them all a temporary water source that they could use for bathing and washing clothes.

Hoses from an enormous 1,100-gallon tank are run through the house, replacing the old existing water pipes.

“We are very happy that they are taking care of the water problem,” said McMicken, “We are just trying to take a breather and wait for the test results to come back.”

Next-door neighbors Mike and Jonna Phillips are waiting on paperwork to look over and sign for a new water well. Their water issues began on July 12, and they finally had the temporary tank hooked up on Saturday. Before that, Jonna, who is seven months pregnant, drove to a friend’s house every day to shower. She is thrilled that she can finally wash clothes and bathe in her own home and is anxiously awaiting a new well. “Chesapeake is certainly trying to accommodate us better than before,” she said.

At the meeting with Chesapeake spokespersons, residents were also informed that there is ongoing testing to determine where the gas is coming from, and it was noted that the affected wells appear to be fed by the same aquifer.

Geologists were present at the meeting in an attempt to help explain aquifers, the type of rock formations in the area and how it may all relate to the potential movement of gas beneath the earth.

The Rocket-Courier has been communicating over the past week with Chesapeake Energy officials on the Paradise Road situation, posing a number of questions.

As of press time, there has been no response or statement.
LINK

DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

RED ALERT! Bad Water in Paradise!

Cain Chamberlin
Rocket-Courier
July 29, 2010

Mike Phillips holds the contaminated water that he discovered in his well on July 12 in his left hand, and in his right hand a sample of bottled water. Phillips is concerned that the disturbance in his well is due to gas drilling operations that have taken place near his home.
Photo by Cain Chamberlin


Bad Water in Paradise? Terry Twp. Residents Await Answers

Click here for video of gas igniting from bathroom sink faucet at Phillip's neighbor, Scott Spencer's home.

When Michael and Jonna Phillips woke up on Monday, July 12, they expected it to be like any other day…until they turned on their water.

They noticed that it was an odd, murky, brownish color. For obvious personal safety and health reasons, they decided against tasting it to figure out why.

Since the Phillips’s home, located along Paradise Road in Terry Township, was built in 2002, they have never had any trouble with their water. Their well is approximately 140 deep. They had their water tested in April of this year, and the results came back clear of any contamination, so the sudden change seemed extremely peculiar to them.

The Phillipses were aware that their next-door neighbors, Jared and Heather McMicken, had the same disturbance in their water, although the discoloration of their water started in early June when no one else had the problem, making them think it was just bad luck. The McMicken well is at approximately the same depth as that of the Phillips’s. Soon after the McMickens started having water trouble, Scott Spencer, another nearby resident, made a major discovery in his water as well; he could light it on fire.

“Spit and Sputter”
“All the faucets started
to spit and sputter, so we were curious as to what was going on,” said Spencer.

A Chesapeake drilling site no further than a quarter-mile away from the three homes struck the curiosity of Phillips. Even though all three residents have signed on to lease their land to gas companies, none of their properties has been subject to any operations so far. It made Phillips wonder if the nearby drilling was the culprit.

Phillips finally reached Greg Garrison, an Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) Field Specialist for Chesapeake Energy, after several attempts. Garrison brought a couple of cases of water to their home and looked at the problem for himself. Phillips said that after Garrison saw the disturbance with his own eyes, he told them that they should keep all their receipts dealing with any water purchases or testing and repairs to the well; if the DEP could prove that Chesapeake was at fault, they would be reimbursed.

“He told us that he or someone from Chesapeake would be back on a daily basis,” said Phillips. They have not seen nor heard from anyone at Chesapeake in over a week, while the McMicken family has only seen a Chesapeake representative twice since reporting their water problems.

A representative of the DEP ran a test in the water systems on both the Phillips and McMicken properties on July 15 and again on July 21. According to the DEP, the full results will not be available for about 40 days, but they immediately found rising levels of methane in the water. The reports show the Phillips’s water had minima
l amounts of methane in the first test, but rose to three percent six days later. The McMickens’ level rose from three percent to four percent in the same time period.

DEP Offers Advice
DEP advised them, as well as Scott Spencer and his family, not to drink the water. Heather McMicken, who was diagnosed with Lyme disease, had been drinking close to 25 glasses of tap water per day since the spring until her family’s water problems began. Her children were drinking several glasses every day as well, which concerns her deeply.

“Our kids’ health is number one priority,” she said.

Phillips contacted Thomas Dunn, a local water well specialist, who almost immediately after removing the well cap on July 18 told them that there was gas in the water. Once again, they were advised not to drink the water and told that there was a definite disturbance. According to Mrs. Phillips, who is due to have their second child in October, Garrison told her that she could bathe in the water, although the family doctor advised her not to.

She now has to take her twice-daily showers at a friends’ house about two miles away. Mrs. Spencer, who is also pregnant with their second child, has been bathing in the water because she has no other option. The DEP told the Spencers that the water did contain some effervescence but appeared to be fine, although they shouldn’t drink it, just as a precaution. According to Spencer, the DEP claimed that they would be stopping by on a weekly basis to run water tests but have yet to come back.

“Chesapeake told us that it could be from something five or six years ago that we didn’t realize was happening,” said Spencer, “Basically that the problem was just natural causes.”

Alternate Sources

The Phillipses have purchased a water cooler system, while the Spencers and McMickens are buying bottled water on a regular basis. The children in each family are getting very impatient wondering when they will be able to drink their own water or swim in their plastic kiddie pools again during the current summer heat.

“We don’t know if it will end soon or not, we don’t know what to expect,” Spencer said.

Last week, Phillips wrote several letters in order to address the situation of his family and neighbors. He contacted Chesapeake’s Director of Corporate Development Brian Grove, Sen. Gene Yaw, State Rep. Tina Pickett and Congressman Chris Carney, as well as an environmental lawyer from Washington, DC. Phillips says that he is determined to find answers and to make sure that his drinking water is restored to its original condition.

“No one is immune to this and this is ruining our beautiful place to live,” said Phillips, “All we wanted was a nice, peaceful community. These are young families in new homes, and we just want this problem taken care of.”

(Editor’s Note: Brian Grove, Chesapeake Energy’s Director of Corporate Development, responds to concerns expressed in this article in a statement released on Wednesday, July 28. That statement is published in this issue of the Rocket-Courier.)

Click here for video of gas igniting from bathroom sink faucet at Phillip's neighbor, Scott Spencer's home.

LINK
to article.
(BULLSHIT image for Splashdown post courtesy of Google.)

DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Scientists search for the best treatment

Industry needs effective way to handle frac water

By DAVID THOMPSON
(Williamsport, PA) sungazette.com
February 1, 2010

Pennsylvania has its work cut out for it regarding the treatment and disposal of flowback fluids from drilling in the Marcellus Shale, it was revealed during a summit Friday at Lycoming College.

That was one of several topics discussed at "The Science of the Marcellus Shale" summit, a daylong event sponsored by the college's Clean Water Institute, the Susquehanna Heartland Coalition for Environmental Studies, Northcentral Pennsylvania Conservancy and Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds.

...

The gas industry requires large amounts of water - several million gallons per well - to extract gas from the Marcellus Shale.

Although much of that water will remain in the ground, the industry still faces challenges in finding efficient and cost effective ways to treat and dispose of the water that does return to the surface.

Each well drilled in the Marcellus Shale will produce from 200,000 to 1 million gallons of flowback water, according to Tim Keister, founder and chief chemist of Brockway-based ProChem Tech, a company that makes chemicals for wastewater treatment.

Treatment capacity limited

The capacity for treating that water in Pennsylvania is limited, Keister said.

Frac water is water with a number of materials added to it, he said. The most problematic of the ingredients is a biocide used to prevent micro-organisms from growing in the well, he said.

"Biocides kill things," Keister said.

Unfortunately, there is "a big shortfall" in the state's capacity to treat gas drilling wastewater," Keister said.

The industry will produce an estimated 7 billion gallons of wastewater a year, while the state's capacity for handling the water is about 550 million gallons - 6,450 million gallons "you have to find a home for," he said.

Treatment technologies include pretreatment so conventional wastewater treatment processes can efficiently treat the waste; chemical precipitation, which involves adding chemicals to the wastewater to form particles that settle and remove contaminants; and evaporation, an expensive process.

Marcellus Shale flowback water contains very high levels of salt, which cannot be removed through normal wastewater treatment processes, said Kevin Gilmore, a professor at Bucknell University.

Gilmore discussed technologies being explored to treat flowback water, such as a process in which the water is pushed through a non-porous membrane and permeates through the other side. It is yet to be seen if the process can be applied on a scale that can benefit the gas industry, he said.

A similar process, reverse osmosis, is energy intensive and does not get water to the point at which it can be discharged, he said.

Richard Adams, senior environmental adviser for Texas-based Chief Oil and Gas, said his company has drilled 45 wells in the shale, 13 of which are producing commercially. The company has 550,000 acres leased in the shale region, he said.

The company is withdrawing about 100,000 gallons of water a day from various creeks and public water supplies in the area, Adams said.

An average of about 20,000 gallons of wastewater must disposed of each day, he said. The wastewater is treated at a public treatment facility in Sunbury and at a private facility in Williamsport, where it is pre-treated before being discharged into the city sanitary sewer system.

Adams, who worked for more than 30 years for the state Department of Environmental Protection, said managing gas industry wastewater is complicated. Wastewater can be pre-treated, treated at a high-tech centralized treatment facility, treated on-site by a mobile treatment facility or, in the case of solids removed from the water, buried in an approved landfill.

Because it is expensive to transport wastewater to treatment facilities, gas companies are looking more and more to recycling and reusing the water, Adams said.

Recycling can save gas companies "tens of thousands of dollars ... per well," he said.

To recycle flowback water, it is kept at the well pad, reconditioned with an additive and reused to frac the next well by blending it with fresh water, he said.

Recycling and reuse is the least expensive method of dealing with wastewater, Adams said. However, there are concerns using recycled frac water to stimulate a well may adversely impact the well's production capabilities.

Adams said the majority of Chief's drilling operations are using flowback recycling "in one form or another."

Recycling also reduces the industry's need for fresh water, he said.

"You are going to see increased levels of reuse," he said. "It just makes sense."

Even with recycling, there still will be a need to treat and dispose of frac water and materials removed from the water, he said. A time will come when recycled water is no longer fit to be used, or there may not be another well ready to be fraced.

Although there are several options available to treat and dispose of flowback, one that is not available is injection wells.

The state's injection wells simply do not have the capacity for the large volume of flowback fluids anticipated from developing the Marcellus Shale, said Karen Johnson, chief of Groundwater and Enforcement Branch of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Underwater Injection Control Program. The EPA oversees the underground injection well program in Pennsylvania, she said.

Private well testing urged

Bryan Swistock of Penn State Cooperative Extension discussed private water well testing. There are about 3 million property owners in the state who use a private well or spring as a drinking water supply, Swistock said.

Swistock said the extension has been "begging and pleading" for homeowners to have their water tested, but not many did. Since the Marcellus Shale began being developed, 2 million wells have been tested, he said.

Depending on what a homeowner desires, testing can be inexpensive or cost hundreds of dollars "to have everything tested," he said.

Swistock said a good basic and inexpensive test could include total dissolved solids, pH content, chloride and methane.

Swistock said homeowners should learn where and when drilling will occur and then monitor their wells if it is occurring nearby. They should understand the type of testing they should have done, he said.

"Focus on what is most likely to occur for the least cost," he said.

According to Swistock, if a private water supply within 1,000 feet of a gas well becomes adversely impacted within six months of the well being drilled, the law automatically presumes the gas well caused the problem.

However, the homeowner must have had the well tested by an independent lab prior to the well being drilled, he said.

No "presumed responsibility" law exists regarding a stream, pond or lake, Swistock said. However, a landowner can stipulate those protections into a gas lease.

Concerns about water treatment are coupled with concerns about the amount of water the industry needs to develop the shale.

The Susquehanna River Basin Commission is a multi-state compact that regulates and enforces water withdrawal and consumptive use of water in the states in the watershed.

Consumptive use is defined as any use in which water is not returned to its source.

The commission requires a permit for the consumption of an average of 100,000 gallons per day over 30 days, according to Jennifer Hoffman, of the commission.

That rule applies to any person or industry wishing to use that amount of water, Hoffman said. No such threshold exists for gas development in the Marcellus Shale.

"For Marcellus activities, we start regulating at drop one," Hoffman said.

So far, all permits issued for withdrawal by gas companies has been for surface water, such as streams, lakes and rivers, Hoffman said. No groundwater withdrawal permits have been issued.

For a permit to be issued, an environmental screening must be performed to determine whether the withdrawal will impact the body of water.

The commission also has water intake standards to prevent fish from being drawn into the intake pipes and metering plans to ensure companies withdraw only the amount permitted, Hoffman said.

Allowed withdrawals are based on what is called "Q 7,10" - or the lowest average flow a stream could experience over seven consecutive days during a 10-year span. Only a fraction of the Q 7,10 level for any given body of water can be withdrawn, Hoffman said.

Certain high-quality streams, particularly coldwater trout streams, have an assigned "passby level," which protects streams during times of low volume. Passby is the level of water flow that must be maintained downstream from an intake pipe, Hoffman said.

Once a stream reaches the predetermined passby level, "water can't be withdrawn anymore," she said.

Although the gas industry requires large amounts of water, the total used by the entire industry pales in comparison to a single nuclear power plant, which can use more than 40 million gallons of water every day, Hoffman said.

Trout stream worries

Deb Nardone, of the Pennsylvania Council of Trout Unlimited, said many of the organization's members are concerned about the industry's impact on trout stream habitat.

The organization's position on gas exploration is "let's do it, but let's do it right," Nardone said.

"We understand (gas) is not going away ... and it will require a whole lot of water," she said.

Nardone said the presence of trout in a stream is "the canary in the coal mine" that can be indicative of a healthy ecosystem.

Better regulatory protections are in place for trout streams and connected wetlands, Nardone said.

There are concerns withdrawing water may open a stream up to invasive species and diseases transported from tanker trucks from one stream to another.

There also are concerns with withdrawing water during certain times of the year, such as when eggs are being incubated or trout are spawning, she said.

Nardone said the organization is recommending seasonal restrictions on water consumption, technologies and methods to reduce consumption, mandatory flow monitoring devices, assessing streams prior to withdrawals, metered intakes, water pumps designed to prevent stream disturbance and fish mortality, and disinfection protocols to prevent the spread of disease and invasive species.

To read more, CLICK HERE.

DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

"Poisoning people’s drinking water is not something to be tolerated."

COMMENTARY
By George E Turner
Tunkhannock, PA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

As a licensed professional geologist with more than twenty years of experience in groundwater work and environmental cleanups, and one who has done a great deal of research on the various chemicals commonly used in fracking, I started doing well testing for people who live near proposed gas wells.

The majority of the ground water that we have in this area is exceptionally good drinking water that is free of contamination. It is our most precious and underappreciated resource.

The Dimock residents filing the lawsuit may not have had adequate testing of their water after the blast to determine either the number, or the type of chemicals in their water. Methane may be the most noticeable contaminant as evidenced by the explosion, but in this type of contamination, it probably is not the only one, or the most dangerous one.

Traces of methane in drinking water are common, but the huge amount that is bubbling out of it now, is not. Full analysis of the water for all of the chemicals used in drilling and fracking the wells, and for any contaminants brought up from the Marcellus Formation, should be done periodically by an independent agency. The drilling companies should be required to pay for the testing. The idea that they don’t have to disclose what they pump into the ground is unbelievable.

Landowners need to know that DEP only requires the gas companies to do water tests on water wells that are within 1000 feet of the drilling site. Considering the fact that gas wells today can be drilled horizontally up to at least a mile in all directions from the well site, the DEP 1000 foot
> requirement is not enough. I suspect that the 1000 foot limit on the testing of nearby wells was enacted before horizontal drilling became commonplace.

It’s finally time that the drilling companies are being held responsible for all of the damages they have caused by Marcellus Shale drilling. At Dimock, Cabot initially maintained that the company was not responsible for the water contamination, simply because no one could prove that the contamination was not there before the gas wells were drilled.

People have no idea what they are up against. Protect yourself beforehand. By sampling your water now, what you are doing now is laying the groundwork for a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the oil companies for contaminating your groundwater. If your water turns up contaminated after a gas well is drilled, and you don’t have undisputable proof that it was not contaminated before the drilling, you’re out of luck.

To stand up in court, the sampling must be done by a professional with the proper geological and
groundwater contamination knowledge, who has no interest, either financial or otherwise, in the property. The samples need to be placed in special laboratory cleaned containers, and immediately placed on ice and kept there during transportation to the labs. Chain-of-custody forms must be maintained for all of the samples. They show that neither the landowner, nor anyone else, had access to them.

These are legal documents that show who took the samples, and who had access to them from the time they were taken, to the time they were delivered to the lab. The credibility of the test requires that the samples must be kept under lock and key. Analysis must be done by labs certified by both the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

If the drilling companies are put on notice that they will pay dearly for any mistakes that they make, then they will be more careful not to make them. I am not personally opposed to gas drilling, but I feel that the oil and gas companies need to be held accountable. Water is our number one natural resource, a precious commodity that no one can live without. Poisoning people’s drinking water is not something to be tolerated.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Mr. George E Turner, P.G.
Licensed Professional Geologist
1645 SR 29S
Tunkhannock, Pa. 18657
Phone: 570-836-1055

DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!

RURAL IMPACT VIDEOS, 6 parts

Natural gas development in Colorado, the impacts on communities, environment and public health. A primer for public servants and residents of counties that care for their lifestyles.

Drilling for Gas in Bradford County, PA ... Listen!

Cattle Drinking Drilling Waste!

EPA... FDA... Hello? How many different ways are we going to have to eat this? ... Thank you TXSharon for all you do! ... Stay tuned in at http://txsharon.blogspot.com

Landfarms

A film by Txsharon. Thank you Sharon for all you do. Click HERE to read the complete article on Bluedaze: Landfarms: Spreading Toxic Drilling Waste on Farmland

SkyTruth: Upper Green River Valley - A View From Above